Skip to main content

What is love?

People use the word “love” all the time, especially around this time of year, and it’s a major part of several cultures, as we find it within song, books, and film, but what does it really mean?
Many people simply believe love is an animalistic or genetic urge that dictates our behaviour, and a survival instinct so humanity doesn’t become extinct. They consider the feeling of “love” to be an extension of chemical-biological elements of the human nature that takes place when choosing a mate. However a problem for this is that it doesn’t explain the affections for those who cannot have kids or do not wish to reproduce.
Others believe in Plato’s version of love; that love is made of a series of characteristics, in which the animalistic desire or base lust is suspended by an intellectual conception of love, based on sensual attraction and mutuality.
Ancient philosophy suggests the idea that love is made from eros, philia, and agape. The term eros refers to the part of love made of a passionate intense desire for something, or moreover, the sexual desire for someone. Within Greek mythology, Eros is the son of the Greek Goddess Aphrodite, and the God of sexual desire and attraction; his Roman counterpart being the well-known Cupid. However, to Plato, eros simply only meant to hold a simple desire for beauty, within the person, due to our natural behaviour to search for true beauty that reminds us of the beauty within the World of Forms.
The word philia contrasts eros, entailing a fondness and appreciation for others. For ancient Greeks, the term not only suggested a fondness for friends, but loyalties for family, one’s community, and their job. Aristotle suggests that philia is the purest part of friendship, as it cannot come from those who gossip, or those who are aggressive in manner or personality, but rather from than who are temperate, and full of virtue. Although Aristotle says reciprocity is necessary, it doesn’t have to be equal, as a saying of Aristotelian love and friendship is that “the better should be more loved than he loves”, however, saying this, the love should still be proportional.
The term agape refers to the paternal love for god for man, and to man for god, and extends to include a brotherly love for all of humanity. This is built upon within humanity in Leviticus 19:18 with the commandment of loving “thy neighbour as thyself”, as Aquinas used the Aristotelian theories to proclaim God as the most rational being and therefore the most deserving of one’s love, respect, and considerations. However, those who are not religious use the saying “it is better to give than receive”. Most claim that it’s simply a concept of universal love, and of loving people equally, whereas other’s claim this is impractical, due to most not being able to experience being in love with more than one person at a time. But this leads to the question what is the difference of being in love and loving someone?  
Being in love with someone, suggests a romantic love, which is deemed to be of a higher status than sexual or physical attractiveness alone. The idea stems from the Platonic tradition that love is a desire for beauty that transcends the physical body, or in simpler terms, comes from within a person. Romantic love also comes to Aristotle’s theory, similar to the idea of soulmates, and the special love two people find in each other’s virtues – the idea of one soul within two bodies.
Whereas loving someone suggests an innocent love, perhaps using the idea of philia and agape, but forgetting the sexual desire part of love.

The two types of love may be why some feel that they can love more than one person at a time; they may love the multiple people in different ways, as they may love a lot of their friends, however may only be in love with one person, and the person may just be having trouble finding the difference between the two feelings since they are so similar, and therefore confusing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the taboo

Mental health has been a taboo subject for a long time, but why? You wouldn’t hide a broken bone, due to the shame of having broken it, so why are people ashamed of having a mental illness, and why do people try to hide it? No matter if the issue is physical or mental, there is no reason to hide it, as there should be no shame behind it. Yet mental health is a taboo subject? Society makes it hard for people suffering with mental illnesses to be open, as the world we live in just make people feel alone and full of shame. Over 2/3 of people suffering from mental illnesses have told someone that they feel isolated, worthless and ashamed, which is ridiculous as the mind is just another part of our body, and talking about mental illnesses, especially common ones such as anxiety and depression, should be as easy to talk about as a grazed knee. Mental health issues can affect everyone; age, gender, race, career, none of it matters, they can still be affected by mental health. Within te...

Is Mother Nature a lousy mother?

Most people can agree that when outside, and surrounded by nature of some sort, it can be a comforting feeling; the pleasant sound of wind rustling the leaves, or waves gently crashing along a shore, but is nature as calm and pleasant as it seems? Take the ocean for example, all that water and it’s still possible to die of thirst, or the fact that even the calmest bodies of water could be hiding horrible current, waiting to pull you under. This could even be seen as a metaphor for life in a way; even when things seem like they are great, and nothing could go wrong, there’s always something there waiting to grab and pull you under. However, nowhere has has nature told us that the ocean is for anything but transport between islands, however people just complain when they can’t use it for another purpose. Mother Nature has also given us the bitter irony of a desert - scorching hot during the day but freezing cold during the night, rather than the usual climate of an average temper...

How does video enhance the user experience on a website?

All of the internet, no matter what site you’re on, you’re most likely to find a video somewhere on that page, but why is that? First of all, videos are more entertaining than reading a long piece of writing, and as human beings, we like to be entertained - otherwise why would cinemas, concerts, or games exist? If a website has a short video, or two, explaining what the site is about, more people are statistically likely to look around the website more, simply to watch the videos, and through this, they will take more of the information in - this is why a lot of revision websites also include videos within their sites. Furthermore, it’s much easier to sit, waiting for the video to play, and it takes a lot less effort than what reading does. Also, it’s a lot easy to show what you want to show, and create the right moods within a video than it is within writing. Sure, there’s emotive writing, but it’s videos that affect the majority, not writing. A video within a website, partic...